Archive for January, 2010

Social Media’s Short Attention Span

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

The term OFN (Old Effing News) gets thrown around a lot on social media circles. Don’t come late to the party on things like celebrity news; people will be all over you — “that was so 9:30am.”

The funny thing about that is more people are getting gun-shy to share things for fear of being tagged with the dreaded OFN from their more sarcastic social media friends. The outcome of this behavior is the premature death of some topics that may need more of our collective attention then they receive.

Twitter has turned us into roving reporters and there is a sport in breaking the latest news. Unfortunately if you are the second or third person to tweet something, you have basically lost the game. (By the way I just lost the game.) So the natural reaction for some is to hold back the post they were originally going to send and hunt for a new, more recent tidbit to post, or just sit back and see the news roll in from others and not engage at all.

The other side of this effect is how this short attention span affects businesses. Good and bad. Take for example United Breaks Guitars. This thing hit You Tube and exploded all over every social media outlet. The video was played 3.5 million out of the gate and has been viewed 7.4 million times since it aired 6 months ago.

How did this affect United’s bottom line? There were reports at first that the airline’s stock price dropped 10% in the first 4 days of the song’s airing. But we came to find out that those numbers were greatly exaggerated.

Did United do anything to fix the problem? Not really… they addressed the problem with public statements and PR spin, but aside from that they made no “sweeping changes” to how they operate their business.

Do people still use United to fly? Absolutely… in fact, United barely saw a ripple in their overall lift because of this incident. One contributing factor to this is people moved on as fast as they jumped on this event.

The collective attention span of social media rivals that of mainstream media. Right now the biggest thing is the horrible earthquakes in Haiti. It was awesome to see the support and response via social media. At the same time lets hope the next “Tiger Woods” type incident doesn’t take over the collective social media conscious too soon… (I’m not holding my breath on that.)

By the way… please donate to the Red Cross for the Haitian earthquake victims.

The True Cost of User Experience

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

In some schools of thought, user experience (UX) and usability testing are a box to be checked somewhere in the development life cycle. As long as you, at some point in development, talk to someone about the UX of your product things should move smoothly ahead. Usually these UX talks happen near or at the end of development and any feedback given is taken with a grain of salt.

The problem with this thought pattern is all the hidden costs of overlooking or short selling UX.

Password Reset FormFor instance this very real example shows a very confusing UX while trying to change a password for a login to an online application. (I am not going to reveal the company that had this experience. They have since come to the light side and now embrace usability and user testing.)

As you can see the form is pretty straight forward until you have to select what button to press to complete the task. The form is asking you if would like to reset your password. If you do, you fill out the form and then… Do I hit OK? Maybe that seems like I am giving the form permission to reset my password. Do I hit RESET? I think so… The form is asking me to “reset” my password so “RESET” must be the right button.

Wrong.

The RESET button clears the fields above and doesn’t give you any feedback as to what just happened. Oh, by the way, the OK button does the same thing. There is no feedback telling you that your password has been reset. Now the user can only assume that their task is complete.

So, how do we break down the overall cost of this terrible user experience?

First we take a look at it from the user side. They now assume that their password has been changed. The next time they come to use the application; they put in their user name and their newly changed password. The application tells them that “The username and/or password are incorrect. Please try again.” So thinking they misspelled something they try again… same error. Fumbling around with this several times is taking precious time and patience away from the user. This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to cost.

Next that user then calls customer support to get some help. In walks the cost to the proprietor of the application. They are paying for every call that comes into their call center to troubleshoot this issue. They have thousands of users and are now funneling hundreds of calls through their call center on this one issue (Especially because this particular application requires users to change their password every 90 days.).

Some users even go as far as dropping the service and using a competitor’s application. “If it’s this hard to change your password, I can only imagine how difficult the rest of the application is.” Now, this may be an extreme viewpoint, but there were still some customers who felt that way. Hidden cost number 3 — loss of users.

Fed up with all the issue troubleshooting, the company decides that they need to get to the bottom of all the problems their users are having and perform some user testing. They go through several sessions of usability, take the finding and come up with a plan to implement the necessary changes to make the UX better for their customers.

The final cost of that is taking part of the development staff off their current tasks, getting them to crawl back through all the code to fix all the troubled spots of the application, retesting the application to make sure the changes haven’t caused any additional issues elsewhere in the application and finally rerolling that application out to a production environment where the users can take advantage of the new improved UX.

Had this company taken the mock-ups through user testing prior to one line of code being written, they would have discovered this issue (among others) and could have resolved it prior to launch. This would have prevented all the hidden costs of aggravated customers, larger call center volumes, troubleshooting time with each customer, lost customers and a ton of rework getting in the way of new enhancements and pushing back future releases.

The cost of that simple change up front would have been minor compared to what actually occurred.

Social Media Contests – Participation is Not Always Easy to Come By

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Give away something for nothing and people will say “yes please.” Give away something for almost nothing and people will say “what’s the catch.” By nature, people do not want to do a whole lot to get something especially if the activity will step outside the bounds of their normal daily routine.

A month ago I had the privilege of helping Funjet Vacations execute a Social Media giveaway. Some of you will probably remember me badgering you to go outside and make Snow Angels. If not, the premise behind the contest was simple – Funjet was giving away 10 all inclusive 4 night/5 day air and hotel trips for 2. All people had to do was go outside, make a snow angel, take a picture of it and post it to a special contest page. If they did that they were entered… pretty simple right?

Not really. In fact, it seemed extraordinarily difficult to get people to participate at all.

We decided at the onset of the contest to post the photos we received as soon as we could get them approved. The thought was two-fold: 1) People could use others photos as inspiration and motivation to do their own. 2) People could see how many participants there are and gage their odds of winning.

We blasted out messages, posts and updates for 5 days on the Funjet Facebook and Twitter accounts along with several of us using our personal accounts to do the same.

Our network reach on Facebook was roughly 2400 people with a multiplier of 160. (Multiplier = average number of followers owned by the original 2400 person network.)

On Twitter it was 3100 people with a multiplier of 340.

Doing the math… on the 1st level market reach Funjet was at 384,000 individuals for Facebook and 1.05 million for Twitter.

What do you think our total participation was? Wait for it…

313 total submissions over 5 days. Insert record skipping noise here. That’s right… a whopping 313. The odds of winning the contest at that participation rate were 1 in 30. Whoa! What happened? Was our messaging too obscure? Did we somehow make Snow Angels to difficult?

Unfortunately it wasn’t that simple. Of the people who participated, one reason for not sharing with their networks was they didn’t want the competition. They wanted their odds to be as good as possible. This one I understand. I can see keeping the odds in your favor. I get that.

I surveyed some people in my network that didn’t participate to find out why, and what I found out baffled me. The main reason I got was that they had to do something to be entered. They weren’t just entered for becoming a fan or following Funjet. “It was too hard to enter the drawing.”

Really? Lying down in the snow for 5 seconds and flailing was too much to ask for? Taking a picture and uploading it was just too much heavy lifting?

Apparently yes. And, apparently if they weren’t going to do it themselves, they weren’t going to share it with their own networks and they were just going to ignore the rest of the messages coming though for the duration of the contest. This surprised me… maybe it shouldn’t have, but it did. I didn’t think asking people to make snow angels for the chance to win 1 of 20 all inclusive trips was too much to ask.

I was a bit disappointed, but on the flip side I learned a lot. It helped me tweak Funjet’s engagement and retention strategy to account for future promotions. I learned what type of promotions we should run depending on what is the end goal of the promotion.

Running social promotions are a good thing for your brand to do; you just have to have realistic expectations.

If you are running a promotion to gain additional followers and more brand awareness, use contests that keep people in their daily routine as much as possible. Have a “ReTweet” or a “Hashtag” contest that enters individuals into drawings for something as simple as ReTweeting a message and following you on Twitter or Hashtagging a phrase and tweeting it to be entered.

You can still run participatory contests and promotions. I do believe there is still a place for those types of engagements. If you already have a loyal following, you can use these types of promotions to roll out new products and services. Or perhaps use them to get people to use your products and services on a base level and upgrade in the near future.

Understanding your audience and their participation threshold is vital for planning social media promotions. These contests and promotions can be powerful brand loyalty and advocacy builders if you have realistic goals and expectations.

Taking a Stand

Friday, January 8th, 2010

I’m addicted to RSS feeds. I read roughly 300 feeds a week from all realms of nerdom, design, online marketing, social media – you get the point.

Of all of these feeds, the one thing that really bothers me — to the point of un-following some feeds — is when a writer gives an opinion article a controversial title, but within the article itself takes no stance on the subjects at hand.

One example of this is the “Smart phone OS showdown: iPhone vs Android vs Palm Pre” article on CNet’s UK site. The title suggests that the writer is pitting these mobile operating systems against each other. I assumed that they’d give a thorough breakdown of which one is best and why. The author even ends the first page with two questions “But will there be a winner? Will one phone – and it’s OS – reign supreme?

As I read this first page, I thought… Ooh, I want to know which one is definitively better than the rest because I am in the market for a smart phone and want to make an educated choice; I trust CNet, so maybe they can help me with my decision.

Then what happens? I have to read though 11 individual pages of various amounts of tech, design, user experience and interface jargon which I have to wait for each individual page to load because who really wants to read a blog post all on one page (note sarcasm and… I’ll digress). Don’t get me wrong the article does offer up some very good insight on each of the devices and their respective OSs (Is that how you make that plural???). Page 12 is titled Conclusion — I see that title and I immediately think ok Mike, here comes the pay-off… This summary will lend itself to your decision making…

What do I see…? The first sentence says — “It’s truly hard to pick a ‘winner’ here.” What??? I just waded through 12 pages of article and ads to get to this???

Then there’s a milquetoast summary of the entire review and an apology – “We’re sorry to wimp out, be we can’t decide this for you.” – ???

I wanted to punch something.

I wasn’t looking for them to decide for me, but I was looking for their opinion. They’d done tons of research and I wanted the recommendation to validate or negate the direction I was leaning.

So, what’s my point…? My point is; take a stand. Let me say that again… TAKE A STAND. Seriously. It’s your job as a blogger to offer an opinion; provide your readers some value whether they agree with you or not. Let them challenge you in the comments if they don’t agree. Open up some dialog on the topics you are writing about. That’s far more interesting than writing a review on something that offers no insight or opinion and then letting the “fanboys” slug it out in the comments.

Trust me when I say this…you will gain a far better and larger following on your blog if you offer up your professional and personal opinions. You will start better and more engaging conversations about subjects that interest your followers. You will offer more value and gain credibility for taking a stand. (See how I wrapped that up with the title in the last line. Pretty clever huh?!?)

Practicing What I Preach

Monday, January 4th, 2010

Happy new year everyone! 2009 was an interesting year for Hello Goat Designs. We got some new clients that we are very excited about and we lost one of our major ones. That lose has been a challenge heading into the New Year, but we are taking on new opportunities as they come. When one door closes, another one opens; funny how that works.

The other interesting thing that has happened in 2009 is my new role at my day job. Over the last 6 months I’ve been transitioning into a Social Computing Strategist role for Funjet Vacations and the other brands the The Mark Travel Corporation owns and manages. It has truly been an exciting 6 months.

The first duty I performed in this new role was traveling around the Midwest for Funjet Vacations giving Social Media overview presentations to travel agents at Funjet’s annual tradeshows. These presentations were surface level talks about Twitter and Facebook mainly. They also briefly touched on the other Social Media avenues such as blogs, social bookmarking and social multimedia to name a few.

These presentations were such a big hit that shortly after the tradeshows; I started giving bi-monthly webinars for Funjet that covered more detailed information about using these social media tools for business and marketing purposes and the benefits of doing so.

In conjunction with these webinars, Funjet sent me to Cancun (I know, I know… poor me) to give one on one social media training sessions to their top travel agents and agencies. These “pool side” sessions (ok, I’ll stop rubbing it in) went into specific examples and covered everything from practical first steps into social media to more advanced marketing campaigns useful to agencies with established social media presences.

One of the main topics I covered with agents who had a firm grasp on things like Twitter and Facebook was the power of blogging. I talked about being experts in the travel space and using that expertise to build a loyal following and recruiting brand advocates. I gave them advice on using blogs to show the niche expertise to the general public to build credibility and trust. For example, one agency I talked to specialized in destination wedding travel. I showed them how having a good blog with great content could build a following, improve word of mouth and build credibility in their brand. I also showed them how powerful it is to write a blog about a niche product and how marketing that blog via other social channels can reach an audience that is looking for that exact product.

The whole time I was giving this training – especially the blogging parts, I was using the “do as I say not as I do” method of teaching. That really got me thinking… If I am truly going into the Social Computing Strategy field I need to make some adjustments to my online and social media life. I need to start blogging; I need to start communicating on a larger level with my network of friends and fans. I need to, just as I told the travel agents, share my expertise to gain credibility and to build trust in my personal brand.

So, here I am… far from an expert, but trying to build some credibility (sometimes I do know what I’m talking about… sometimes). I have made the choice to start blogging on a regular basis. I have even talked Angela (@hellogoat) into contributing a blog entry once a week. Moving forward, we will be sharing some topics with a little more meat. We want to share our experiences in design, web development and running a small business. Hopefully you will learn some things about Hello Goat Designs, share a few laughs, and relate to some of our experiences.

Thanks for the support and stay tuned…

Hello Goat Footer Divider
Hello Goat Footer Divider
Hello Goat: The Blog is proudly powered by WordPress.